Another way to do things: 2 chain 1 coin the proposal

feedback welcome here or as coment in document


I want to say that understanding the complexity of the migration process, I have to talk about exactly how it seems to me. Even if I am not very competent in the technical part. Because I am driven by the interest of the investor. It seems to me that the option with two coins can give a terrible risk of losing an investment. Besides, I don’t like the idea of reducing the initial supply of XEM2, because even though the token itself will be more expensive, the total value of the balance sheet will have to grow much more than XEM1 (10-20$ per 1 token). Therefore, it seems to me quite an interesting idea to get a new CATXEM by means of such burning. But we have to discuss safety.

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.