Awesome stuff, thanks so much for your hard work on this Quantum_Mechanics!
Any time-lines on the Apostille certificate generation to be reduced in size and in PDF in future? That will be great
Awesome stuff, thanks so much for your hard work on this Quantum_Mechanics!
Any time-lines on the Apostille certificate generation to be reduced in size and in PDF in future? That will be great
that will definitely be on our list of things to do.
Hi QM.
When setting 0-of-m using Edit a multisignature contract
This is a specification that will be m-of-m.
However, NanoWallet can not sign m-of-m.
Notice comes but all signatures can not be done
My address
NB2225-VL43PT-ZROTAE-IMVZFW-JK3CPE-7Y23OF-RTTO
sorry Poor English
âŚCan you understand that?
I am not good at English.
Hi,
Yes I understand
Thanks for the report, will look into it for upcoming release
Hello there!
I have had a data update issue with the NanoWallet which I think is important. Following is the Scenario:
I believe there is a problem here as the Update should be done in background, and probably broke as states following screenshot:
NCK34K5LIXL4OMPDLVGPTWPZMGFTDRZQEBRS5Q2S
Take care!
I asked the same question before.
Again, I think that it is better to describe the final fee for the multi-sig account fee.
Some people have received opinions that Fee is different from some people.
I think that it is better to add the following items to the current Fee display.
⌠+ (Min signatures - 1 (Isser)) à 6
Thank you for your consideration.
Hello @Quantum_Mechanics and community.
First of all, congratulations for the huge effort that youâre doing to maintain and grow NanoWallet.
As an improvement for future releases, I would like that the post includes the checksum to ensure the validity of the file. What do you think?
I leave here the sha256sum
for future readers.
08d963a7a537dbb32ff5278c1958f56f1c2baa20b7a29e5c5e4e4f7e70b47ee5 NanoWallet-1.3.4 -- Apostille TX f9a506e3abfa225d60b4447017279a6af7561428e0f53839fb3bea92fe8c129d -- Date 2017-04-20.zip
Best,
Hi, checksum is now added to the op .
Yeah I think it could, will look into it for the next release
I donât know if this is considered as a bug but i think it is a issue that could be approved. First time i created a wallet and logged into it the node was automatically chosen and active. The second time i logged in the node was not chosen automatically. And for a new person using the wallet it gave me almost a heart attack to not see my account balance. Could the wallet have maybe a text in dashboard to make it very clear when node is not selected? The text: nothing to show is pretty alerting :D.
Maybe something like: nothing to show here, select a node
Even adding a text that tells that the nodes are safe to connect would probably decrease problems with new account owners.
Another thing I noticed:
Updating the market information doesnât seem to update the USD balance.
-J
ND6NJZ-AZLZS4-PWYMUH-4ERJNU-YIYZWO-FFKH2X-SLXK
Hi, the default node can be down sometimes probably because it gets a lot of traffic.
Changing the node manually from the navbar update the node in your local storage too so it should reconnect to the last node you have picked.
I am working on fetching the closest supernode from user location or use default if it canât.
It can take a few minutes for the APIs of market providers to be updated
I wanted to but Github release does not allow spaces in file names so the audit via Apostille would failâŚ
Just released the bounty was still high so lowered it from 5000 to 500.
I have reported a couple of times but never got a reward until now.
I have also reported several times in past repositories.
Really have rewards?
The download page is still ver1.3.4.
Please update to the current latest.
Ok will do.
I have never gotten either.
Although I have personally received chips.
NCVGXT-CV7YYG-CUTOWR-SEALEV-HVTDFR-J54BQY-DKTI