As I understood:
Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.0
it was said that:
71% [mixmaster: as mentioned... actually 71,125 %] - distributed to stakeholders on the final stakeholder list.
10% - reserved for the core development team to fund development of the NCC and NIS up to the release of V.1 of the blockchain.
10% - reserved for the core development team to fund development of the NCC and NIS after the release of V.1 of the blockchain.
5% - reserved for the extended development team; those who are working on promoting NEM and the NEM ecosystem.
4% [mixmaster: actually 3,875 %] - auctioned off at a later date.
Stakebased this means:
2845 stakes - distributed to stakeholders on the final stakeholder list.
400 stakes - reserved for the core development team to fund development of the NCC and NIS up to the release of V.1 of the blockchain.
400 stakes - reserved for the core development team to fund development of the NCC and NIS after the release of V.1 of the blockchain.
200 stakes - reserved for the extended development team; those who are working on promoting NEM and the NEM ecosystem.
155 stakes - auctioned off at a later date.
Now there are not 2845 but less stakeholders. I don't have current numbers, but its devided in
- x sock puppet registrations and
- y unclaimed stakes
now we are getting closer...
In your text there is
"2845 stakes - distributed to stakeholders".
You add that the 2845 is
"devided in
- x sock puppet registrations and
- y unclaimed stakes"
Think about this: if I go to some customer, who wants that I build one small building to him, he will ask the costs. I say that there is needed 10000 USD and every day 20 USD to each worker.
The customer says "OK. Will you start today. How many 20's I give to you today?"
He takes his wallet and is ready to give the money.
I say "Well, here I am and my friend next to me. And in our van is 10 sock puppets. So is the 240 USD ok?"
Guess, what the customer will answer.
Now in NEM it is tried to do the same thing.
We all know that sock puppets are not real persons. The customer above will ignore them. So must NEM ignore puppets.
I have not seen any document which would justify to include 'sock puppets' into any distribution calculations.
Eg. in the last newsletter was linked sock puppets and development contract.
Where is that development contract, which says about sock puppets that
"these stakes are supposed to go ... fund" ?Not here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19so-Jy3Gqw2KltZP-gaw3oFaHliN0OdtwZktOP4pCOQ/edit?pli=1
Also the case of 'unclaimed stakes' is unsolved. Documentation of that exists in ... ?
The equal and fair distribution was defined:
"stake spot = 4 billion/ (total account stake + development stake)"
That formula does not cointain sock puppets and neither unclaimed stakes.
In this and silver coin threads are presented so many examples, which show how senseless idea is to use "something that may come or may join".
Here is one example again:
A new crypto coin will be created and they announce an equal and fair distribution.
"We will share 2000 000 000 coins equally to all, the maximum is 2000 members"
The announcement thread is soon full. There is not known that the situation is:
- 1000 accounts reserved a stake
- 1000 sock puppets reserved a stake
After the reservation period has ended, it is informed that they have 2000 stakes, because it is not yet known that there are sock puppets. So it is said that everyone will get 1 million coins.
When 1 month is passed, they notice that there are 1000 sock puppets.
Then is invented that the sock puppets' stakes is used to a fund.
And they say that everyone is still getting 1 million coins and the coin has a great fund that will make it even better and getting greater distribution.
People believe it and give a half of their original share to the common wealth, which future is a quite open question mark.
Do you think that the 1000 members agree with the decision above?
Do you think that they feel that they have been betrayed?
Do you think that they do not wonder, where the half of the coins is going to?
Do you think that they are pleased, when they are informed that
"1000 000 000 coins will be in a foundation, which will be managed by all of us.
Those coins will be invested to projects, which will be decided in community votes.
Every vote is a finite decision and it cannot be complained.
Every vote is arranged in our digital system and every vote must be accepted by the majority of those people, who have given their votes. For example, if there is 10 votes and 6 agree, then the proposal wins.
There may be arranged votes every week. The voting time is always 2 weeks, because the decisions must be done quickly in this fast digital world."