Even if you want to remit any mosaic, 1 XEM will be remitted forcibly.
I think this is a specification.
This can also be thought of not being able to transmit mosaic only.
I would like to know why 1 XEM is forcibly sent during mosaic transmission.
Even if you want to remit any mosaic, 1 XEM will be remitted forcibly.
I think this is a specification.
This can also be thought of not being able to transmit mosaic only.
I would like to know why 1 XEM is forcibly sent during mosaic transmission.
you are right, canât send 0 xemâŚmy best guess is mosaic needs a transaction to attach to.
altho, i donât see why you could send 0 XEM without a mosaicâŚ
If you only want to send a message, remittance of 0XEM is meaningful.
Because the publickey is not displayed for the account you just created, you may remit 0XEM to display it.
(I made a mistranslation lol Do not mind this post)
No, the amount field has to interpreted in a different way when you transfer mosaics.
An amount of 1 (xem) means that 1 times the attachment is transferred.
An amount of 2 (xem) means that 2 times the attachment is transferred.
And so onâŚ
If you transfer only non-xem mosaics, then no xem (aside from the fee) is deducted from your account.
ok, but you canât modify the amount of XEM, is it always 1 then?
Futher, in this example, how much xem am i tranferring ? 10 or 0.000010 ?
if itâs 0.000010 then it seems that i can transfer 10k xem as mosaic for fee of 1 XEM, but if i am sending 10k the usual way the fee is 10 XEM
is that the reason why this logic is implemented?
Thank you
The number of attached mosaics is displayed.
And in fact, that XEM will not be remitted.
And I understood.
I attached three mosaics now. It also includes XEM.
However, the fixed display remains 1.
I want a little explanation.
In addition, in NEM Authenticater, there is an example that when sent only mosaic, it is displayed as 1 XEM remittance.
This is here, we have received correspondence separately.
Even if it is not remitted, the meaning of grayout means that it can not be rewritten.
In terms of user interface,
¡ Display 0 or â-â is displayed.
¡ Display NEM:XEM mosaic value if it is transmitted
I think I should do either.
In this case, 0.00001 XEM will be remitted.
In the case of token transfer, it is necessary to be aware of the decimal point even with XEM.
If the unit is not XEM and NEM as a token: XEM, it becomes â1 NEM:XEM = 0.000001 XEMâ. This is the smallest unit using XEMâs decimal point.
Speaking of BTC, it makes me feel using SATOSHI.
In Nano Wallet, probably is, i didnât try.
10 micro xem = 0.000010 xem
No, 10k xem transferred the usual way has 1 xem fee, mosaic transfer is also 1 xem (rounded down from 1.25 xem).
The display in Nano Wallet is not optimal, i agree. It should either just show â-â as you said or a 1 with some explanatioon that it means one times the mosaics displayed on the right side.
That is why you have the âTotalâ field.
Thank you, BR.
Post on NanoWalletâs Issue.
thank you, and yes, you are right, i put one zero more and didnât see it, sorry.