Dependence of transaction on PoI

How does the mechanics of increasing PoI through transactions >1000XEM work?
I have 9 incoming transactions from exchanges and 2 outgoing to another exchange, while I do not see the influence of these transactions on my PoI, but I see some strange little fluctuations of its value.
image

If you want someone analyse it probably you must provide your address. Of course only outgoing transactions counts and they should give you importance bost for 30 days (decreasing over time to 0 boost in day 30).
Maybe somewhere in past you receive from exchanges to which you sent these transactions?

I send my NEM address to you.
If only outgoing transactions are scored, it’s explains something. I had only 2 transactions for 1000 XEM, the first 12-30, and the second 01-03. And 01-03 has the highest peak.
Nevertheless, it’s strange that the first transaction had no effect, and those unclear little fluctuations.
Сan be such that my PoI depends on the availability of other harvesters in the network?

I guess it should be impact to calculated importance if more users have over 10000 xem vested balance because importance after sum from all account can’t be than 100%.
Also when your vested balance increase (incomming transaction) importance should increase also I guess.

It will be nice if you will have second chart presenting vested balance and next one with your balance.

BTW. Great that you analyse this.

image

@BloodyRookie
Could you look at this if you find some time? :slight_smile:
Mostly explain what factors have impact to importance beside outgoing tx over 1000 xem and vested balance.

I take accounts that have PoI only from vested ballance (no outgoing transaction) and have same values of vested ballace as my too extreme values. Then I connected these two points by a straight line on my graph, and got this:
image
I can assume that the growth by vested ballance compensate by impact of transactions, as a result it forms a flat curve. But I still have some questions.