[DEV] Blockexplorer

General Discussion
#41


Sorry, my formulation was misleading ;)
The larger the number of samples taken to compute the average times, the smaller the range is within it varies. My request is to have a minimum range from 55 seconds to 65 seconds for the Y-axis so that I can see that the oscillation decreases if I choose a large number of samples for averaging.
Btw, would it be possible not to reset the range of blocks used (I mean the slider at the bottom) when I change the number of samples for averaging (upper slider)?


Hello.

I have updated the code on the githun so from version 0.1.1 this feature should be partially  functioning +
the 2 things mentioned mentioned before are resolved.
The range is between 40 and 75 but when you change the averages block number calculation it scales from 55 to 65.

@patmast3r:
Please update the code when you will have time!
BTW: Is is possible for you to implement an API call to search blocks by block height too?!
Thanks.

#42



Sorry, my formulation was misleading ;)
The larger the number of samples taken to compute the average times, the smaller the range is within it varies. My request is to have a minimum range from 55 seconds to 65 seconds for the Y-axis so that I can see that the oscillation decreases if I choose a large number of samples for averaging.
Btw, would it be possible not to reset the range of blocks used (I mean the slider at the bottom) when I change the number of samples for averaging (upper slider)?


Hello.

I have updated the code on the githun so from version 0.1.1 this feature should be partially  functioning +
the 2 things mentioned mentioned before are resolved.
The range is between 40 and 75 but when you change the averages block number calculation it scales from 55 to 65.

@patmast3r:
Please update the code when you will have time!
BTW: Is is possible for you to implement an API call to search blocks by block height too?!
Thanks.


Will do and yes sure it is. In fact I think it's already there and I might have just not communicated it.
Will look into it.
#43

@freigeist: I tested the new statistic version, it's fantastic. Thank you very much! The statistics clearly shows that our block generation algorithm works pretty well :slight_smile:

#44

[font=verdana]@freigeist - great work![/font]

#45

I think blockexplorer must recognize addresses in this format

TC4ETE-Y7RV3F-HOSBCF-YRGKL3-NPBOJR-TLFUKG-OTBX

not only without "-" like this TC4ETEY7RV3FHOSBCFYRGKL3NPBOJRTLFUKGOTBX

because is impossible directly to copy address from the client and paste them to blockexplorer

#46

I agree with filchef.

#47

I thought it did…
I'll give the blockexplorer some more attention when the redemption has started and is going smoothly.

#48

I think blockexplorer must recognize addresses in this format

TC4ETE-Y7RV3F-HOSBCF-YRGKL3-NPBOJR-TLFUKG-OTBX

not only without "-" like this TC4ETEY7RV3FHOSBCFYRGKL3NPBOJRTLFUKGOTBX

because is impossible directly to copy address from the client and paste them to blockexplorer


You mean when you try to search the block ?
If so i have put a regex restricion for the carachters that can be enetered in the serach box The "-"
sign is curently a non valid sign.
I will change the code to allow the addresses in format from the NCC.


#49


I think blockexplorer must recognize addresses in this format

TC4ETE-Y7RV3F-HOSBCF-YRGKL3-NPBOJR-TLFUKG-OTBX

not only without "-" like this TC4ETEY7RV3FHOSBCFYRGKL3NPBOJRTLFUKGOTBX

because is impossible directly to copy address from the client and paste them to blockexplorer


You mean when you try to search the block ?
If so i have put a regex restricion for the carachters that can be enetered in the serach box The "-"
sign is curently a non valid sign.
I will change the code to allow the addresses in format from the NCC.

Thank you @freigeist I make issue here https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/blockexplorer/issues
#50

sender and recipient inverted in blockexplorer transaction list https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/blockexplorer/issues/6

#51

sender and recipient inverted in blockexplorer transaction list https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/blockexplorer/issues/6


Hello I have updated the code on github and solved this issue and issue #4
https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/blockexplorer/issues/4

@patmast3r:
Can you update the blockexplorer with the latest code. Thanks.
Also when you find the time check this 2 issues please:

https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/blockexplorer/issues/1
Here I miss the API call for such functionality.

https://github.com/NewEconomyMovement/blockexplorer/issues/5
I have tried to use:
http://chain.nem.ninja/api/transfers?address=(any valid  NEM address)

but i received always the:
500: Internal Server Error

Bye.
#52

Hey, can you tell when the block explorer will work with the beta version?

#53

Hey, can you tell when the block explorer will work with the beta version?


later today...don't know exactly.
#54

No any update for blockexplorer - did you start it in this condition when real Nem start without repair the bugs.

#55

No any update for blockexplorer - did you start it in this condition when real Nem start without repair the bugs.


Kinda busy with other stuff.
Feel free to contribute. It's not like we have a patent on NEM Blockexplorers pedning.
#56

So I am not coder but @freigeist make some fork to solve some issues and nobody merge them before start the beta.

#57

So I am not coder but @freigeist make some fork to solve some issues and nobody merge them before start the beta.


from where i stand there never was a fork and all changes i new about were included.
#58


So I am not coder but @freigeist make some fork to solve some issues and nobody merge them before start the beta.


from where i stand there never was a fork and all changes i new about were included.


Hello

@filchef:
I have never made a fork I just resolved some issues in the user interface and in the UI script and updated github directly without any forks.

Please check here my latest post:
[url=https://forum.ournem.com/index.php?topic=2373.msg5816#msg5816]https://forum.ournem.com/index.php?topic=2373.msg5816#msg5816

@Pat: it seem when you updated the files on the server that the nem-be.js is still from version 0.1.1 alpha and
in the repository the latest version is 0.1.2 alpha.
Please can you check and update the code on your server when you find some time so that
I can close the issue reported by filchef on github.

Thanks.

BTW beside this issues reported on github and missing features that will come in future it seems to me
that the blockchain explorer is working.
@filchef: Are there any other issues that you know about?!

Thanks to all for your cooperation! ;)
#59

Blockexplorer give me error 502

#60

The VPS it's hosted on is currently running to many things. This will happen a lot. There's nothing I can do about that right now. In fact I might have to shut it down to not risk the protal going down.