I noticed by delegating harvesting with an “activate” it activates remote harvesting and I also “transfer” my importance. I suppose that means, that in exchange for the remote super node doing the harvesting I lose all my importance historically and moving forward. I decided I wanted to harvest locally (which apparently means STILL delegating the harvesting but to localhost when your local NIS is running) but I realized, uh oh, I lost all my importance forever So I decided I would send a DEACTIVATE to the remote address - another 6 XEM lost. But I am not sure if the RETRIEVES my importance. In any event, I have not yet vested the 10000 - but it still allowed the importance transfer to happen both times. The question is for the SECOND transfer with a DEACTIVATE - did it give me my importance back?
Wow good thing I dont have an issue with self-importance And does the NEM platform give you MORE transaction fees if you locally harvest vs delegated harvesting? It should! Better yet I want to have a COLD STORAGE nano ledger. Can I use a COLD STORAGE wallet account with 10k vested and delegate harvesting to my local nano-wallet account with under 10k in it? Does a 10k vested in one acccount transfer as VESTED when you send it to another account or do you LOSE all vesting just form the transfer?