I am concerned about NEM's fee

Hello
I am concerned about NEM’s fee.
In storj, renters pay rental fee on fiat money basis, and lenders get rewards from the pool.
If it exceeds the decided yearly upper limit of the pool, Storj use a way to purchase the market SJCX at the levyed rental fee.
NEM should also be adopting this method for namespace.
I think…

Hello @rightblume,

AFAIK, there are some protocols to “control” the NEM’s fees. I don’t find the document where everything is explained now, but I hope someone could reference it.

:slight_smile:

@rightblume with NEM you can define levy for Mosaics too. That means that whenever someone Transfers some of your Namespaces’ Mosaic, they will need to pay the Levy too (which can be of any existing Mosaic - also XEM.)