NEM Beta 0.4.12

Releases
#61



About at height 10400, rigel started his script to pump out transactions. If you are at 10081, the next batch of blocks you request from a node goes up to about 10700. There are many transactions to fetch from the db. That's why you run into the timeout if you are unlucky. We have to look into that issue. There seems to be a bottleneck.

So his script caused this? Perhaps once this instance is fixed we should get a number of people running scripts to test it even harder? Can't let this happen after launch. We should try to test the network beyond the amount of transactions that are expected after launch...


It uncovered a few bottlenecks in the code that we're working to fix.

Any ideas yet?

Sorry, but Im really curious about that ;)
#62

I have been checking my harvested blocks and transactions a couple of times over the last couple of days against the block explorer and everything matches perfectly. 

I hope someday we will be better than [url=http://www.coindesk.com/information/what-is-bitcoin]Bitcoin

#63

Does it still make sense to keep spamming 0.4.12-BETA at all?
One bottleneck was found and we are waiting for the next release. And then we should check again.

#64

Does it still make sense to keep spamming 0.4.12-BETA at all?
One bottleneck was found and we are waiting for the next release. And then we should check again.


I think it worth the rffort.

And the code is ready for the next release to make a lot of hard spam anyway

:)
#65

In which way is it worth it?

#66

In which way is it worth it?


If there will be the necessity to make a lot of spam to test the network, we can use this scrypt or the old one.

Just it.

I prefer know this kind of bugs now than after lauch, whith an exchange telling us there is a bug somewhere.

;)
#67

I never said the script isn't useful. Its perfect to test out the performance.

I was just asking: Does it still make sense to keep spamming 0.4.12-BETA at all?

A bug was found and will be fixed in the next release. So right now it probably doesn't make any sense to keep the script running. It just consumes power :wink:

#68

I never said the script isn't useful. Its perfect to test out the performance.

I was just asking: Does it still make sense to keep spamming 0.4.12-BETA at all?

A bug was found and will be fixed in the next release. So right now it probably doesn't make any sense to keep the script running. It just consumes power ;)


Sorry.. I got it wrong.

I think it worth cause my linux client can synchronize very well, but my windows client no.

There are a lot of clients working very well as I take a look on the chain.bob

I By the way, If it has a bug on block 20 k... we should know as well too. Thats why Im sending money all over the network.

I know its waste of energy but it worth the effort I think.

#69

Ok, I still don't really get it, but whatever :wink:

I was just testing the script out to be ready when the next release is coming.

I always get "send returned 400". What can I do to find the reason?

#70

Ok, I still don't really get it, but whatever ;)

I was just testing the script out to be ready when the next release is coming.

I always get "send returned 400". What can I do to find the reason?


this is the reason:

400: 'Some parameter is missing or invalid.',

Check the password and username.

I noticed there is a missing ' on password  :( -->  'password': 'YOUR PASS HERE',

About the test: I can tell you i've worked whith a lot of coins and some coins have forks on the 5k (example) blocks, after 10 k, after 32k, after 64k and so on.

Why the chain bugs? I have no idea!

While the chain does not restart, if it will, Its nice to have some transactions!

;)
#71

Yes I saw the missing ' at the end of the password, thats not it.

Username and password are definitely correct (copy/paste).

Could it be that my password is too much for python? It looks like this: C!NzB0@baPGob:d.

#72

I had NIS and NCC running and had my wallet opened when I tried to run the script the first time.
After it didn't work, I closed the wallet in my browser, because I thought that could disturb it somehow… But it doesnt help.

Can you try it? Just enter username/password.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f1omrric2k2goz4/spam-skript.py?dl=0

Edit: Oh wait. I just saw that my NIS crashed again (the web interface showed "is synchronized" the whole time though… -.-). I'll restart NIS and try again.

#73

While I test, you need the package requests too. Its essential. Easier way to get it is pip:

https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html#id7

#74

While I test, you need the package requests too. Its essential. Easier way to get it is pip:

https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html#id7

I know, already installed it :)
#75

It still doesnt work after restarting NIS and NCC.

NCC says this (when starting the script):
Http Status Code 400: expected value for property account, but none was found

#76


While I test, you need the package requests too. Its essential. Easier way to get it is pip:

https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html#id7

I know, already installed it :)


the monster here didnt pasted all the code  :(

Really sorry.

I pasted the correct code now.

Sorry for the incident  ;)

https://forum.ournem.com/index.php?topic=2595.msg8063#msg8063
#77



While I test, you need the package requests too. Its essential. Easier way to get it is pip:

https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/installing.html#id7

I know, already installed it :)


the monster here didnt pasted all the code  :(

Really sorry.

I pasted the correct code now.

Sorry for the incident  ;)

https://forum.ournem.com/index.php?topic=2595.msg8063#msg8063

The missing package "requests" is not the reason. As I said: I already installed that.

Can you come to #ournem at IRC?
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=web-5
#78

There are changes in the code.

I accidentally deleted part of the code while deleting my password.

#79

There are changes in the code.

I accidentally deleted part of the code while deleting my password.

Ok, works now. Thanks ;)
#80

I need to tell you I dont know why, but using the bot even whitn 25 seconds between transactions, thats really easy to enter in a blockchain branch.

I need to restart the client very often.

:frowning:

bot: https://forum.ournem.com/index.php?topic=2595.msg8063#msg8063