A poster PM me in Bitcointalk that "This is the coin which pushed through a logo the community didn't want. That is the first among many unpopular things to come, imho. " He refers to this voting https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=668434.0
@Makoto: you should be fair and have an open process where the community can make the final decision. If you play favoritism with your personal opinion, you will lose the popular support from the community and in this space it is a serious issue. Anyway, I won't talk about this issue anymore. Hopefully, the administration would have a good sense to make the correct choice.
Do note that in a lot of things we do in life, somethings need to be pushed. Otherwise, there will be no conclusion and nothing moves. None has so far come close to what a logo should be.
There have been lots of comments. It is easy to be a critique but it is never easy for anyone to come out with something to please everyone. Some will be vocal, many will be indifferent while many others may like just like it.
In a lot of these, we will need to practice the 80:20 rule but it has to be a firm conclusion.
I note you have been the quite vocal and that's ok. But it would be good if you can contribute some ideas to the logo as well so that all of us can then put a vote on whether what's in your mind is acceptable by many.
Please remember that "one man's poison is another man's food".
In any case, trust Makoto that he will put this to vote, come the day to choose a logo. We will need to be firm on this by August.
I have been vocal because I have a strong aesthetic sense. I don't know why you wrote "it would be good if you can contribute some ideas to the logo as well so that all of us can then put a vote on whether what's in your mind is acceptable by many. " because I did that many times already here and in BTT forum. Are you in the logo committee ? because I never seen any of your comment on the relevant matters to choosing a GOOD logo but rather the comments are presented as some types of generic disregards or excuses.
For example: "It is easy to be a critique but it is never easy for anyone to come out with something to please everyone." how is that relevant at all? I have said before I respects the works having been done and mind you that being good at decent critiques is not easy as you think. A good critique opens a pathway to the understanding of the subject matter and many thanks the critics for that.
I say it again that one man's poison is another man's food. It is never the prerogative of anyone to claim that he or she has strong aesthetic sense as anyone else could claim the same. It will then be a never ending debate of who is more aesthetic.
I have not been vocal because, I voted for Makoto's initial design and therefore there is no need to comment further unless there are new ones that are worthy of comment or to vote for.
I personally do not like the cube but I reserved my comment because I am waiting for more designs to come in.
I penned the initial description of the logo after Makoto came out with the design. I pushed for a logo to be finalised because we had not been conclusive on the logo. None of the logos put forth till Makoto's design was acceptable enough to be adopted as an interim logo.
No decision was firm and no conclusion was made. That's why I made the comment, "Do note that in a lot of things we do in life, somethings need to be pushed..."
There are many things we need to do and Makoto has become a utility man hopping from being a developer, marketeer, writer and a designer and we must recognise that he has put in a lot of effort to make this logo good.
I note you have been vocal in pushing the cube. Anymore alternative designs?
And I said that it is "easy to be a critique" because good critiques are far and few in between. Therefore, a negative vote or criticism may not mean anything at all as the person who voted against it simply may not have a clue.
We shall put all designs to vote anyway and there is no need for us all to talk about it until designs are put to vote. I would appeal to all to contribute their designs for consideration rather than to comment. By commenting, there is less likelihood of coming out with a good design. A picture paints a thousand words.
I have purposely refrained myself from commenting all this while because this is all very subjective and will lead to dissatisfaction and unhappiness among many.
If you read through my few posts on the logo, my comments have been indeed very generic and seldom talking about the logo itself but only reminding ourselves that this is all very subjective and people should contribute designs instead. Further, we need to be reminded that this is not a cryptocoin design per se but a crypto economy. Therefore, the logo should represent that.
So, with your comment of, "disregards or excuses" I am not sure what you meant by that.
Finally, I am all for putting designs to vote than to just comment. All logos put to vote should be accompanied with an explanatory note. We leave it to the community to vote for the designs thereafter.