4. Devs buy the silvers from AltNemo and AltNemo is selling the stakes.
At vastly inflated prices and it is obvious to anyone with half a brain that devs have a nice little money making deal with AltNemo.
Whilst we are at it, do note that the first round of 155 stakes (taken from socks) that were meant to be auctioned off belongs to the devs as bonus if they did not use it.
Nice profit for you, and still you want unclaimed stakes too?
Here are some facts for you:
[li]community fund will be managed by community, so if sock stakes would be there they would be managed by community[/li]
[li]devs don't have deal with AltNemo, you have my word on that, you can either believe me or not (also I'm really interested how would that money making look)[/li]
[li]most devs were against buying silver coins for community, but that's how community voted[/li]
[li]don't mix up altnemo initiatives with NEM itself[/li]
[li]unclaimed - where did you get that from? those should belong to community fund as well[/li]
edit:
[li]just in case you've missed it: devs/marketing/eco are not allowed to get silvercoins for stakes[/li]
gimre thanks for stating the facts.
AltNemo is a company. NEM development is independent from AltNemo.
The managing of a community fund has no problems now - as it is not the question of this time. Before we are in that state, we have to solve this:
what is saved to a community fund?Eg. in the last newsletter was linked sock puppets and development contract.
Where is that development contract, which says about sock puppets that
"these stakes are supposed to go ... fund" ?
Not here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19so-Jy3Gqw2KltZP-gaw3oFaHliN0OdtwZktOP4pCOQ/edit?pli=1
Also the case of 'unclaimed stakes' is unsolved. Documentation of that?
Without documents I would not say that these are facts about puppets, unclaimed stakes and funds.
It is an open issue, which strongly affects to the NEM distribution.
Edit:
About the vote: in an important case like this, the issue should have had more discussion and information before the vote and the vote should have more voters than 59 (out from ~1500 registered stakeholder + 500 yet unclaimed stakeholders). When there is not enough voters, then happens usually so that the suggested issue wins, because there already have been supporters before they decide to take the issue to a vote.
In the other thread
https://forum.ournem.com/nem-news-alerts/stakes-of-sock-puppets-and-unclaimed-stakes/new/#new
is presented some examples, how the coins are distributed.
There is only one commentator, who seems to promote the example, where each stakeholder gets 1/4000th of the total amount of stakes.
Example 6. Fixed stake size 1/4000th = 2.2 M to each 1500 stakeholder, rest to fund - Fund 1 is the coins from unclaimed stakes
- Fund 2 is the coins, which sock puppets reserved
- Fund 3 is needed for "leftovers" to get the 100% full
- p% = coins/total * 100
stak p% coins coins/stakeholder
Stakeholders 1500 37.50 3375000000 2250000
Fund 1 500 12.50 1124999999
Fund 2 250 6.25 562500000
Dev team 25 2249999999
Fund 3 18.75 1687500000
Total 100 8999999999
According to that example there would be plenty of coins for eg. silver project.
Will this be the distribution of NEM?