My node (#127) failed in round #1847 in “responsiveness” field. It was happened several times in the past - and by each this fail I’m pretty sure, that response/connectivity of my (super)node is allright/fine/as_usual. So it must be some network outage between my node (Europe) and (that round) measuring node (e.g. in U.S.). I understand that these situations should happened (and sometimes they happened), but - of course - I have a “sad feeling” from this result. Even if my node is working well, serving clients (at least from Europe rank) well, I’m missing my (deserved) reward - again.
So, BR, is there any idea, how to improve the tests or this “responsivity part” of tests ? Is it possible to do repeating attempt (if 1st attempt failed in any reason), with longer delay between 1st and 2nd attempt, for example? Or, if there are several measuring nodes in several locations (suppose they are?), could the 2nd measure provide another node (from another location), if 1st-round-node failed (or the test failed from any reason) ?
Of course I understand that it means extra-work for you (and I guess you’re already overloaded enough, regardless to supernodes portfolio), and that the whole measuring process becomes more complex. On the other hand, it would be more fair to all operators of their supernodes.