Hey guys! How about 880 000 000 000 000 NEM or 888 000 000 000 000 NEM on 880 000 000 000 or 888 000 000 000 people in future? After 1000 years.
On russian, my post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=455591.msg9494046#msg9494046
Google translate :
This World loves when coins much and on the contrary much. PPC coin was the first such example. I remember then it compared to TerraCoin. People spoke: Yes PPC won't rise, how many coins. TRC will rise. As a result there was the return, that coin on which more than coins on the contrary rose, and that on which there are less than coins - died. And such examples weight. The world loves when there is a weight. Examples now are dogs, it is BitShares X. If to compare BTSX to NXT, in principle coins are twice more - has to cost twice less in comparison with NXT, but as if not so. The price at them identical. At the price in parity, but by quantity of coins of BTSX above NXT twice and on intra day turns of BTSX beats NXT nearly 5-7 times. Sometimes separation maxima in day turns reach already figure by 10 times of 
Proceeding from all above-mentioned it is possible to draw a conclusion that this world loves weight. The coin - the more to it is more powerful than interest from people. Especially here Nem as I understood, completely arrange under Asia, and Asia is producers of the benefits. The new world economy also has to begin with those who doesn't live virtually on credit and with those who makes the benefits. As I understood, in Asia number 4 very bad number, here they also want to make at Nem other number of coins in the big party. In total on the Hair dryer Shuya as they say.
If Nem has 8 billion coins, such quantity approximately is adjusted to number of the people living on the planet. So each inhabitant of the planet can by the right have one whole coin of Nem but not as in the bitkakh and the laytakh - ten-thousand shares from their total of 21 M and 84 M respectively. But needs of the world would require more coins that at each inhabitant of Earth was not on one coin and at least on 1000. We somehow speculated on a subject if the whole world uses cryptocurrency of one - how many coins will be necessary for needs of the 8th milliard population of the planet? Met I remember in the moments on opinion on dogs, but Ito 99 billion dogs won't be enough to cover needs of each person on at least 1000 coins. The coin from 8 trillion coins, and it at least is necessary. To the person, any, on the nature, it is necessary to possess at least 1000 coins. If it possesses figures below this quantity, at the internal level starts arising at it the feeling of that it isn't enough coins and when coins is a little is regarded as crisis. And crises to anything good don't lead.
Conclusion: The ideal cryptocurrency of the future that it covered needs of the whole world not on 0.000001 on each inhabitant of Earth and even not on 1, has to begin with total of coins of 8 trillion. But it is better to do with a stock in advance and to do a coin with 888 trillion coins as the population of Earth will soon face overpopulation problems, it will give vent on Earth orbit, and thanks to near-earth artificial mini planets the population will only increase in the big party. 888 trillion coins ideally so far fit into the population that which is now and in future population when people becomes still in 10 times more, and even in 100! Such coin will have to sustain any stress test, at least on the sounded maximum number of the population in 800 billion people. When we speak about a future coin, it is necessary to consider all moments. And it is the main - a podstraivayemost under new realities of time, i.e. if tomorrow an era quantum comes - the coin and a network has to easily as a transformer to take the new forms through smooth tunnel pass, it has to pass freely without loss of all that was old, thereby easily accepting and passing to new technologies of quantum computers. And that constantly increasing population of the planet at least on the next didn't lack 1000 (crisis in the heads) coins on one soul of the population. I suggested to give to people of coins from 1000, but it is possible more proceeding from 888 trillion general coins on 888 billion people put (at most) in the future.
On russian, post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=455591.msg9494496#msg9494496
Google translate :
It is necessary to think not about today, about here and now, and for thousands of the years ahead. Therefore for future generations of people everything has to be enough. There shouldn't be crises in the heads and shortage something. The person has to have everything much because everyone was given rise to prosper. And if there are at you 0.000001 coins - it won't be pleasant to anybody. Even now for people to have 0.01 BTC is at the psychological level and on internal causes the word a little. Here and crisis, at first in the heads is born. It is very big miscalculation I was at the founder Satoshi concerning quantity of coins. It was necessary to do more coins not to cause then the word a little.
We have to study on others mistakes and have to create for each inhabitant of Earth in respect of monetary units - abundance. That people never said that Nem at them isn't enough.
Three 8s is an auspicious number.
I'm afraid I will have to learn Russian to understand you, but it might be worth it!
I'm afraid I will have to learn Russian to understand you, but it might be worth it!
Нам нужно думать о будущих поколениях постоянно растущего населения планеты Земля.
Google translate :
We need to think of future generations of constantly increasing population of the planet Earth.
too bad "smite" only works once an hour.
Planned 4 000 000 000 NEM to within 0.000001 NEM is 4 000 000 000 000 000 μNEM (microNEM). It is 400 000 μNEM for each inhabitant of the Earth approximately, based on the projected population of the Earth in 2100, 10 billion people. If need be, nothing prevents the code to open more decimal places, and 400 000 μNEM for one conditional person turns into 400 000 000 nNEM (nanoNEM) and 400 000 000 000 pNEM (picoNEM), etc. There is absolutely no point in manipulations of the integer part of the value.
I am sure later on after NEM gets some kind of asset exchange or monetary supply or something like that, you can just create an asset with as many coins as you want and then lock those into NEM.
So basically in the future I can make a mini-NEM on the NEM platform and have it just be more NEM to meet the population.
A supply of billions was once controversial until somebody took the unprecedented initiative to try it and now it is the standard for newer coins.
Do we want to make 2 million Bitcoiners happy or so we want to make digital currencies something used by billions? If so then I think we need a supply in the trillions. Even 800 - 888 trillion as that is close to all the money, assets and derivatives in the world
Planned 4 000 000 000 NEM to within 0.000001 NEM is 4 000 000 000 000 000 μNEM (microNEM). It is 400 000 μNEM for each inhabitant of the Earth approximately, based on the projected population of the Earth in 2100, 10 billion people. If need be, nothing prevents the code to open more decimal places, and 400 000 μNEM for one conditional person turns into 400 000 000 nNEM (nanoNEM) and 400 000 000 000 pNEM (picoNEM), etc. There is absolutely no point in manipulations of the integer part of the value.
The USD is about 1 Quadrillion picoUSD. See its parallel to what you are trying to say.
Planned 4 000 000 000 NEM to within 0.000001 NEM is 4 000 000 000 000 000 μNEM (microNEM). It is 400 000 μNEM for each inhabitant of the Earth approximately, based on the projected population of the Earth in 2100, 10 billion people. If need be, nothing prevents the code to open more decimal places, and 400 000 μNEM for one conditional person turns into 400 000 000 nNEM (nanoNEM) and 400 000 000 000 pNEM (picoNEM), etc. There is absolutely no point in manipulations of the integer part of the value.
The USD is about 1 Quadrillion picoUSD. See its parallel to what you are trying to say.
I do not propose to introduce a picoNEM, it is hypothetically. I want to say only that the 4 000 000 000 NEM will be enough anyway.
Would we be the first coin with a trillion? Maybe 8 trillion coins is the way to go.
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
Maybe we could win over the DOGD-coiners. Very NEM much coin!
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
Maybe we could win over the DOGD-coiners. Very NEM much coin!
Well a New Economy Movement should have a lot of coins...!!!!!!
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
I agree
Maybe we could win over the DOGD-coiners. Very NEM much coin!
Well a New Economy Movement should have a lot of coins...!!!!!!
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
I agree
Maybe we could win over the DOGD-coiners. Very NEM much coin!
Well a New Economy Movement should have a lot of coins...!!!!!!
Actually,maybe it should be 8 trillion... ;D ;D ;D
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
I agree
Maybe we could win over the DOGD-coiners. Very NEM much coin!
Well a New Economy Movement should have a lot of coins...!!!!!!
Actually,maybe it should be 8 trillion... ;D ;D ;D
888 trillions ;)
Would we be the first coin with a trillion?
I say go for it......just think of the publicity......and its actually closer to total amount of money in world.
I repeat that prices of things would be more familiar to people in the longer run.
I agree
Maybe we could win over the DOGD-coiners. Very NEM much coin!
Well a New Economy Movement should have a lot of coins...!!!!!!
Actually,maybe it should be 8 trillion... ;D ;D ;D
888 trillions ;)
Ok.......you have just taken it too far there...... :D :D :D