Migration Committee Community Update #2

Catapult was designed from ground up to be a high throughput blockchain. TPS in the hundreds.

2 Likes

I don’t understand this meaning.

・Tokenomics Agreed
・Agreed Pioneer Exchanges

Please explain the meaning of this word.

1 Like

Hello there,

NEM did have some scalability issues related to the proof of importance algorithm which has been addressed in Catapult (PoS+) by removing the need to keep track of transactions for each account’s importance calculation and instead using paid fees to define activity on the network over the past period P. Other changes on scalability included to minimize the byte size of transactions.

2 Likes

Hello there,

these items respectively specify the date by which tokenomics have to be agreed (plan done and accepted) and the date by which pioneer exchanges have to be agreed (plan done and exchange ready).

1 Like

Thank you for answering. I have a question.
What is “tokenomics” ?

token economics

経済

1 Like

I understand the meaning of the tokenomics word. What do the committee specifically trying to do with tokenomics? What do they agree on? please tell me in detail.

1 Like

I can’t understand "tokenomics ".
Does tokenomics mean to token specifications such as the total amount of catapult XEM issued?

Token Economy may be easier to understand. It’s all about the economics of Catapult. The tokens, the rewards, nodes, etc and how they work together.

1 Like

Are you trying to hide details from us and make some important decisions and agreements below the surface?

No, this is why the updates are being posted to the community.

1 Like

Thank you for your reply. Wait for the detailed report.
I agree with any reviewed plan by economists.Maybe That is correct.
I have no idea Because I have no economic expertise.

However, I pray that old stakeholders will not loss.

1 Like

Thank you very much.

And sorry.

My post was delayed after being approved by the moderator, but I was convinced by your post.

1 Like

I would really like to have the following things mentioned asap:

  • How is the supernode rewards going to be done on the new chain and on the old chain?
  • What will happen to all of the funds? If you want to be a serious blockchain the funds will have to be named and said how the will be used. For example the silver coin fund, nobody knows what will happen with that. Is there going to be a coin burn or a redistribution?
  • How is the post distribution of the coins going to work, will it be done in a decentralized way?

Please clarify the team’s current decisions.
Will the team consider Tokenomics Public Proposal in the future?
If there is a possibility that the number of XEM2 issued will change, I think that the content of the FAQ is not a decision.

Please clarify the team’s current decisions.

1 Like

Exactly. I have a little confusion.
The migration committee should explain who has the final decision and what process will be decided.

4 Likes

in Japan, There is no tax on token swaps when migrating to the mainnet.


Could you please consider the SWAP method again to avoid dilution of tokens?

If anyone wants to use NIS1, they can just use it.
XEM2 must be a stable coin of XEM1.
This can be achieved by using the COMSA HUB mechanism.

Can your team make it so that you can move freely with swap?

I have something to check

Opt-in is done with the current NIS1 account
Is to say

The opt-in account will be created in the catapult chain with the same address as the NIS1 account.

Is my interpretation correct?

Same public key, but the address would be different ie. NEM acc starts with N, catatapult address would start with something else probably

1 Like

I understand
Thank you