Thanks!
I got it working, PASSing the tests now.
I believe it was a syntax error in the config file, and a restart of the NIS fixed it …
BTW, do payments go out at the same time everyday?
in theory yes, but pratically there is a delay of like 20 mins a day. I have to take a look at it when i have time.
Where can I find this log?
After break i got on ship.
My node was SuperNEM1 and LongLifeNEM2.
After week of trying setup node i have figured out why it was not running properly.
Problem is that when i turned off ssh console servant was stopping to keep it running i had to use command to detach proces from console. Now luckily i see them running.I am noob in VPS.
Now i see that i need to use: tmux screen or byobu to keep process running.
I renamed SuperNEM1 to KamilX1
http://supernodes.nem.io/details/41
Then LongLifeNEM2 i renamed to KamilX2 (that that has not changed,but i got payment now )
http://supernodes.nem.io/details/35
KamilX1,LongLifeNEM2(should be KamilX2) both got payments from rewards now .
HI xbladex,
can you explain how to use tmux so you can close the terminal and keep the VPS running. I just keep the terminal on my mac open for now.
From my understanding, if I log out of my ssh & close my terminal it will stop the processes running on my VPS?
I have personały used Byobu its easiest.
1 : “sudo aptitude install byobu”
“byobu” - command
You can press F2 to create a new window within the current session, F3-F4 to switch between the various windows.To leave byobu and keeep it running (detach) press F6.
After F6 you can close ssh terminal and process keep running.
I took me some time to relize that closing ssh is closing process but with those
Yes if you close ssh terminal proces is stopped. plain nem install or servant.
Some scripts like:
setup nem in way that you run NIS in background but i am not so skilled to do it with servant on my own so now i just use fresh install of NEM-NIS and servant then to keep them running i use byobu
ok thanks Ill check this out …
on a vps the log is in /root/nem/nis/logs if you are running it with root account or /home/<your_user>/nem/nis/logs if you are running it using your_user
Renamed the node.
Shouldn’t the 3 million xem limit be lowered now that an xem is worth significantly more than when the 3 million limit was placed? As it is now it’s not feasible for a normal person to buy 3 million xem to participate.
I have to agree. Had to sell some to hedge and no longer will pass the balance test. I will leave it running for the time being though
I think this is a reasonable request and should be at least discussed …
I like to know too, if it can be lowered, right now its so much that I maybe have to let it go…
@BloodyRookie Hi, BloodyRookie.
I would like to change my supernode name from Shibuya001 to Shibuya, and sent change request like this.
http://chain.nem.ninja/#/transfer/c786e6d4c8eea056aebe7dd7b0840426cb9c5a5deea4705c4890970e795590b8
Is this a correct way to change my alias name , right?
If you need extra information, please tell me what you need.
Thank you
I understand why lowering the required balance is requested. The price increased, I know.
The required balance of 3m was set above one stake for some reasons.Those reasons probably did not change with the higher price. Think about it.
The efforts of those who invested on top of a stake to obtain the 3m balance should not be neglected because of questions of those who didn’t do the effort.
The number of network nodes are more than enough to secure the network, although not all parts of the world are equally represented.
And don’t forget all effects lowering the required balance would have as a result … not only positive effects.
Changing rules once the system started would be bad for the reputation of the team and the system they have set up.
I get what your saying about negative effects such as people selling some if the requirement is lowered, but this is happening already (me) with the negative effect of less nodes securing the network. The primary purpose of the project is to secure the network with high quality nodes and there wont be many willing to lock up 54btc to do that.
@BloodyRookie I’m setting up some supernodes for somebody who is afraid to send me their private delegated key. Is it possible to setup the servant/supernode without this if they just want to start remote harvesting manually or is it required 100%? Does anybody have a good source explaining why it’s safe to share the private delegated key?
Thanks!
Don’t make that assumption.
No
. Only think delegatet account can do is harvest for original account so he has nothing to worry about