NEM Supernode Rewards Program

In the past, enroll itself was working even though there was “@”.
I had thought of it before, but I checked the phenomenon which does not appear at https://supernodes.nem.io/map when “@” is present.
"@" Is often the cause of problems.
I will send enroll later without “@”.

thanks

@mizunashi: i added the entry manually to the db since the ip was already used by a disabled node.

1 Like

Oh, Very Thanks!
The name will probably not appear in https://supernodes.nem.io/map this time, so change it later.

It was on the map, just not in the right location since the coordinates were wrong. Fixed it and now the supernode shows up in Japan.

1 Like

@BloodyRookie Nice! Thanks!

Although it is a symptom of long ago, Port 7780 SuperNode refusing access is conspicuous.
This is not monitored by the operation check of SN, it will pass the test every 6 hours.
Obviously, since it does not meet the requirement of SuperNode, I think that you should reconsider adding, etc. to the check item.

thanks

I am not sure what you are referring to. The port is 7880, not 7780. The port has to be open to pass all tests.

I made a mistake. I’m sorry.
It is Port 7778 for lightwallet.

I see. Yes, the tests do not test features that clients need.
Not sure if i should spend time on writing such tests.

I sent “change ip” command more than 3 hours ago, but it is not reflected.
After all, there is a possibility that there is a problem with “@”.

I do not know how long “change ip” will be executed, but if there is a problem, please change ip address. You may also remove “@”.

check the ip, i am getting “Error: Invalid input address” when using a tool like https://www.iplocation.net/

In the explanation, it was written like this, but was there something wrong?
Perhaps, if it is less than three figures, was it impossible to fill it with zero.

yes, probably. Changed it manually in the db.

1 Like

Thanks BR !!

It is truly trivial, but I will report it.
Because #70 is missing, the numbers after that (the arrows) are misaligned.

My delegated harvest account is ON. Still, my vested balance is lower than the bonded deposit (3,000,030 XEM). I will set up a supernode soon. I can say my account in nanowallet has the required bonded deposit (3,000,030 XEM), but I am questining myself that I can set up supernodes with lower vested balance. Any help?

For a supernode it doesn’t matter if the balance is vested or not.

Thank you very much for your help.

Since NEMbex indicated “NEWEST RELEASE: 0.6.91”, I made an update. There is no problem, right?

I also just notice there is a new release. Is it a required update? What is the best way to upgrade?