there are a few things that comes to my mind when I read this and lots of other posts like this:
-
Blockchain is immutable = unforgivable = 0 mistake tolerance.
There are 10000 ways how to loose your crypto-funds and 0 ways how to get them back (maybe 1, if we cout the DAO fail)
-
Immutability is the biggest (and probably the only) advantage of public blockchain. If NEM compromises its immutability, there is NOTHING left of NEM (or any other public blockchain - except etherum which seams to be doing fine …)
For this reasons, I think, blockchain will never be used by normal people for their day to day transactions or as store of value. Under the hood there will be some blockchain, but normal people will never broadcast transactions directly but rather through some 3rd party service provider who knows what he is doing (or at least he thinks he does).
Then, when 3rd party service provider meses up we have big problem.
Maybe some conditions under which immutability could be broken should be defined …
For example people could vote and the change will be executed by some smart contract.
Usually, standard crypto geeks (like me :D) dont even want to hear about this, but hey … etherum is doing fine … and if they had some contingency plan for cases like DAO fail before the actual DAO fail maybe etherum blockchain wouldnt even split …
However this will cause bad precedence for servces like Apostille, LuxTag …
Very hard problem to solve. In future we will read much more posts like this …
Regarding this case:
You should set up some acc for donations and marketing fund can double donations you get from random NEMsters…
There would probably have to be some voting for this, but it has much higher chance to go through than voting to destroy NEM blockchain
I personally think, it would be nice use of marketing fund.